• About
  • Disclosure Policy
  • Archives
  • Categories
  • Archive for September, 2008

    Review: Prom Night (DVD)


    2008 - 09.21

    Prom Night has a certain amount of cachet for those who remember the 1980 original. The first version starred scream queen Jamie Lee Curtis, already a veteran by then of the genre, having starred in the original Halloween two years earlier, as well as The Fog, just prior to making Prom Night. That said … forget everything you know or remember about the original Prom Night because this 2008 film with the same name is in no way a remake, nor does it bear, beyond the title, the faintest resemblance to the original.

    While it remains to be seen if Brittany Snow can assemble a career remotely like that of Jamie Lee Curtis, her work here is not quite as memorable. Of course, part of the problem is the script, which moves the horror movie conventions away from their traditional environs and shifts them to a 21st century wish-fulfillment fantasy land. This Prom Night is no children’s book, but it’s also not exceptionally scary, either.

    Here’s the main problem: early horror films like Halloween and Prom Night worked primarily because they took place in blue-collar suburban settings that nearly everyone could relate to. By comparison, Snow’s Donna Keppel is taking part in a prom night celebration set in one of the ritziest Manhattan hotels one could imagine, with a prom DJ only a high school populated by the very rich could afford.

    All this glamor may look flashy on the silver screen, but distances the character of Donna Keppel and her world from the average viewer; this is what many of us may wish our high school proms had been like, but it is far removed from the experience of most people. This, in turn, makes the terror of being stalked by a prison escapee similarly emotionally distant from the audience, combining to make the film less scary.

    Released in an unrated edition that is a mere 60 seconds longer than the theatrical version, the film was originally rated PG-13 in theaters and this version seems to be not much more risqué than the one seen on Cineplex screens nationwide. I imagine the difference would be something along the lines of a few seconds here are there showing the killer’s knife with blood on it, or something.

    There is a pseudo-documentary included that “investigates” the Prom Night murders, but few of the special features are all that interesting. Had the movie been more effective, perhaps the special features would carry more cachet to them; but since the film is all glitzy Hollywood/New York wish fulfillment, rather than gritty and relatable, there’s not much here that will send shivers down one’s spine.

    Idiots extinguish Midnight Sun


    2008 - 09.15

    A group of spoil-sports have sapped all the fun out of Midnight Sun, including the author’s own sense of fun in writing it. The novel, a follow-up to the four-novel Twilight saga as told from the perspective of vampire Edward Cullen, is a project that may never see the light of day, thanks to some idiot Internet content pirates, who somehow came into possession of several chapters of an early draft, and posted them online withou the author’s knowledge or permission.

    Said Meyer on her Web site:

    I’d rather my fans not read this version of Midnight Sun…My first feeling was that there was no way to continue. Writing isn’t like math; in math, two plus two always equals four no matter what your mood is like. With writing, the way you feel changes everything. If I tried to write Midnight Sun now, in my current frame of mind, James would probably win and all the Cullens would die, which wouldn’t dovetail too well with the original story. In any case, I feel too sad about what has happened to continue working on Midnight Sun, and so it is on hold indefinitely.

    It’s too bad; with Twilight set to premiere on the silver screen in November, the novel was set to be one hot property once it was finished. Now, it’ll be years before the book gets written, if it ever does.

    Hopefully Meyer’s next project won’t experience such a security leak, and cruises to a spot atop the New York Times best-seller’s list for fiction; after penning five very successful novels, it’s time for Meyer to enjoy her success.

    CBS’ $350 million Mother?


    2008 - 09.15

    For a sitcom that was dangling between renewal and cancellation last spring, CBS’ How I Met Your Mother is set to pay off in a big way shortly. Bidding has opened up for the syndication package on the show, which starts season four a week from tonight on September 22, and some industry analysts are predicting that with a number of bidders clamoring for the rights, the show could garner as high as $350 million.

    The most high-profile bidders include Tribune Media, CBS and Fox. Twentieth TV produces the sitcom, which stars Josh Radnor, Allyson Hannigan, Neil Patrick Harris and Cobie Smulders as four friends living in New York City, and is the tale of how Radnor’s character met the mother of his children.

    Despite the growing popularity of digital downloads that can be stored on a hard drive and DVD complete season collections, there’s still plenty of money to be found in syndication deals; the winning bidder could be announced Wednesday, and the syndication deal, once in place, could help stabilize the future of the show for the next few seasons.

    Laurie joins top-paid TV actors club


    2008 - 09.15

    Hugh Laurie won’t need to work behind a retail counter hawking auto parts any time soon, thanks to a new deal that will make him one of the highest-paid actors on television. Laurie is the star of the second-highest rated scripted drama on network TV, Fox’s House M.D.

    When the medical drama began in 2004, Laurie wasn’t even making six figures per episode; he received his first bump two seasons ago, and has been hauling in $250,00 to $300,000 per episode over the past two seasons. The new deal will net Laurie around $400,00 per episode, or about $9 million a year.

    Only William Peterson of CSI ($600,000 per epi) and Keifer Sutherland of 24 ($500,000 per epi) make significantly more than Laurie, and their shows don’t match the ratings performance of House MD, so the remuneration is well-earned. The contract extension guarantees Laurie will stick with the role of grumpy doc Gregory House for four more seasons, through 2011-2012.

    Fey, Poehler open SNL as Palin, Clinton


    2008 - 09.15

    Despite being absent for two years launching her highly successful NBC comedy, 30 Rock, Tina Fey returned to her old Saturday Night Live stomping grounds to kick off the new season with a sharp satire of GOP VP candidate and current Alaska governor Sarah Palin, along with fellow SNL alum Amy Poehler as deposed Dem presidential hopeful and current NY Senator Hillary Rodham.

    The pairing recalls the best moments of the first half of the this decade, when Fey and Poehler ruled SNL and the Weekend Update segment, and the opening sketch was as much a tribute to their on-screen comic chemistry as it was to Palin and Clinton.

    The political season always strengthens SNL’s specialty of political satire and while it’s uncertain if and how often Fey may be available to return to SNL to reprise her Palin impersonation, especially if the GOP ticket takes the White House, what is certain is there wasn’t a funnier, sharper and more enjoyable sketch in the entire SNL season debut. It’s a pairing that is sure to be more in demand than a bunch of unlocked cell phones, especially iPhones.

    Hopefully, it’s a sign of a coming resurgence for the thirty-year-old-plus sketch comedy standby.

    Lohan’s liberal lez-views


    2008 - 09.15

    Considering Lindsay Lohan has joined the pink triangle crowd, it’s unlikely she’ll be shopping with “partner” Samantha Ronson for baby strollers any time soon. But now, like so many Hollywood big-mouths, Lohan has decided to use her marginal celebrity status to weigh in on the current political campaign and – surprise surprise – she’s a leftist. Never would have guessed, wouldja?

    Lohan’s comments on McCain running mate Sarah Palin were especially venomous:

    “I find it quite interesting that a woman who now is running to be second in command of the United States, only four years ago had aspirations to be a television anchor, which is probably all she is qualified to be.”

    The fact that Lohan, whose acting skills were marginal at best even before deciding to “out” herself to regain some sort of relevance, is questioning ANYONE’s qualifications for ANYTHING is laughable and pathetic. After all, there’s not a single role she’s been in that Christina Ricci, Natalie Portman or even Amanda Bynes couldn’t have done far better at.

    Lohan, heal thyself.

    Burn After Reading tops box office


    2008 - 09.15

    The new Coen Brothers movie, Burn After Reading, lurched out a narrow victory over Tyler Perry’s The Family That Preys to take the top of box office honors this weekend, hauling in $19.4 million against a $37 million budget, compared to $18 million for Perry’s movie.

    Righteous Kill was a distant third place with $16.5 million, and in fourth place was The Women, which trailed badly with $10 million. Late summer hits like The House Bunny, Tropic Thunder and The Dark Knight all trailed in the distance with around $4 million each, showing that the movie-going public is finally ready for something – anything, really – new.

    It does not require the services of a Chicago accident attorney to figure out that few of these movies will have much staying power, save for Burn After Reading.

    However, next week’s fantastic four releases include a much better cadre of movies, including the highly anticipated Ricky Gervais comedy, Ghost Town; as well as high-profile releases like the animated Igor family film, classy Neil LaBute thriller Lakeview Terrace and the Kate Hudson romantic comedy, My Best Friend’s Girl.

    I’d place my bets on Ghost Town being the most entertaining, and Igor on being the highest-grossing.

    Review: Tony & Tina’s Wedding (DVD)


    2008 - 09.09

    I like live theater as much as the next guy, but rarely has a stage play been so ham-fistedly adapted to the big screen. Tony & Tina’s Wedding is a long-standing hit on stage, but writer-director Roger Paradiso’s 2004 adaptation for the silver screen is one that deserves to be forgotten rather than memorialized on DVD.

    With That 70s Show’s Mila Kunis as Tina and pretty much no one else of note, the main problem with the film version of the play is that no one toned down the performances for the big screen. While loud, over-the-top characterizations help folks in the cheap seats feel included in a live performance, on screen the result is a lack of subtlety and intimacy that film, by its very nature, lends to the mix.

    Now, sure, it could be argued that the play was adapted for the screen; but the adaptation concentrated mostly on keeping the actors moving on location, rather than having them confined on the stage to a single set. What needed more attention was adapting the performances to a scale that could take advantages of the dynamics of film.

    Instead, the movie breezes along at breakneck speed and although there are many words, little is actually said. Most of the dialog seems incidental and designed to overplay stereotypes, rather than capture subtle ethnic culture and differences.

    As for the DVD package, the special features are only OK, and since they complement such a poor film adaptation of the stage hit, they’re only of passing interest. Some time is spent on explaining the off-Broadway hit that the stage version ended up becoming, but it’s simply not enough to hold together an entire DVD package.

    In the end, one would need an Orovo detox to find Tony & Tina’s Wedding remotely entertaining on the big screen. If you’re looking for a musical to be adapted to the big screen the right way, you’re better off with Mamma Mia! than with Tony and Tina’s Wedding.

    Review: My Mom’s New Boyfriend (DVD)


    2008 - 09.09

    I suppose when they looked at the concept on paper for My Mom’s New Boyfriend, it seemed like a winner. After all, you have Meg Ryan and Antonio Bandaras, who are both bankable, as well as Colin Hanks and Selma Blair, two promising up-and-comers. You have a bit of a Meet the Parents-in-reverse plot going on. What could go wrong, right?

    More than you might imagine. Even though he’s the son of Tom Hanks, one of the most bankable stars in Hollywood, Colin’s not quite seasoned enough to carry a picture and much of the weight of this movie falls on his young shoulders. That’s not to say he won’t eventually grow into the kind of star who can carry a movie; it just means he’s not there yet.

    Blair does her best in a very limited role as the love interest for Hanks who only wants him to stop obsessing about his mom and show her some attention; she’s capable and turns in a solid performance without much to work with.

    Meanwhile, Meg Ryan, star of nearly every romantic comedy ever made since When Harry Met Sally, is not given much better treatment; stuck in an obvious fat-suit that borders on the insulting rather than the realistic at the start of the movie, Ryan is given a role that is written to make her seem a bit dunce-like, rather than like a mom who’s just cutting loose now that she’s lost weight and looks good again.

    Antonio Banderas does well with his role as a thief trying to blend into society to avoid arrest, as well as the wooer of Ryan. As soon as they connect, they may not be checking into hotel deals, but they’re not far from it. The chemistry works well enough and both actors pull off decent takes on their whirlwind romance, however ill-contrived.

    For a chick-flick romantic comedy, however, My Mom’s New Boyfriend is something of a guy’s movie because only the men’s roles seem to have any complexity or depth; whether it’s Ryan or Blair, the women in this film get paper-thin characterizations and never really grow over the course of the film.

    The blame for the mess has to fall on George Gallo, who both wrote and directed the movie. It would have been nice to see just what this movie might have become with Nora Ephron on the script and Rob Reiner directing.

    The one surreal quality of the flick surfaces whenever Hanks and Ryan share screen time; it was only 15 years ago that Ryan was starring opposite Colin’s father, Tom Hanks, in their best film together, Sleepless In Seattle. Now, watching son Colin share screen time with Ryan as his mom gives the film a certain “circle of life” moment, as well as serving to make a person feel old.

    Unfortunately, “My Mom’s New Boyfriend” never really takes advantage of the talents of its decent cast, and so what might have been a memorable movie is reduced to bargain-bin fodder. Which is really too bad.

    True Blood looks like a true guilty pleasure


    2008 - 09.08

    Based on the Southern Vampire Mystery/Sookie Stackhouse books by author Charlaine Harris, HBO’s newest original series, True Blood, is the first new drama from Alan Ball, creator of the now-defunct Six Feet Under. With a combination of humor, horror, mystery and romance, the show captures the frenetic, fun energy of Harris’ novels.

    Featuring a cast where no one is in need of acne treatments, the star of the show is X-Men’s Anna Paquin, who plays Sookie Stackhouse, a telepathic waitress who, with the help of her vampire friend Bill, solves crimes.

    The debut episode is more graphically sexual and features stronger objectionable language than Harris’ novels, but otherwise stays close and true to the source material. In fact, the debut episode that played tonight is taken almost directly from the first few chapters of Harris’ first Sookie novel, Dead Until Dark.

    The big question is whether the freshman melodrama can stand up well against the third season of Showtime’s popular serial killer drama, Dexter.

    Biggest disappointment?


    2008 - 09.08

    My prediction for the biggest disappointment this coming fall TV season is NBC’s My Own Worst Enemy. While the Christian Slater concept-vehicle definitely looked promising when announced last spring, the signs of trouble are all over this one; they’ve already swapped showrunners and the show simply seems to be headed for disaster.

    Or not. I mean, if the show finds itself, it could be a great fit with Chuck and Heroes on NBC Monday nights this fall; however, even a good show isn’t guaranteed to succeed; after all, I personally loved Journeyman and we all know how that one went.

    Still, it seems the Peacock’s Ben Silverman may end up wearing baby clothes over this particular flop-in-waiting before the season’s over.

    Fringe looks tops


    2008 - 09.08

    When it comes to new shows this fall – genuinely new shows and not last seasons rookie-year relaunches, which have plenty of promising skeins – nothing beats the promise of J.J. Abrams’ latest effort, Fringe, on Fox.

    Billed as a bit of a modern take on the X-Files concept, the show promises to be more accessible to new viewers than recent creations like Lost and Alias. While any J.J. Abrams effort is anticipated as much as an acne cure, this show marks his first effort outside of ABC in quite some time.

    Fox, which is doing well with shows like House, Bones and 24, is overdue for its next runaway hit; Fringe is my best bet for delivering on that.