HollywoodIdiocy.com

It’s easy for the rich and famous, to whom such things will never be a concern, to tell the rest of us how to live. The latest example is how Hollywood is lining up behind Sen. Rodham, pregnant with presidential ambitions galore, and her new version of HillaryCare, her method for ensuring “universal health care coverage,” otherwise known as socialism.

While the drive-by media will insist HillaryCare Lite is now market-driven, don’t be fooled; check into the details to detect the Devil’s home address.

In a recent speech in Iowa, the agenda was unveiled: under HillaryCare Lite, it would become illegal to NOT be insured. Of course, Bill’s Hill doesn’t want anyone to think she’s off her rocker, like John Edwards, so she’s selling it a bit softer.

Instead of legal consequences, HillaryCare would simply require anyone applying for a job to provide proof of health insurance; without it, they would be unable to be hired. See? No jail time at all!

Instead of time behind bars, Hillary’s the “reasonable liberal” who will only make it impossible for people who are uninsured to ever achieve gainful employment, thus denying them the source of funds they need to gain the income and job benefits necessary to become insured.

And for those who are unable to be hired because they’re not insured? Well, hell, let’s put them on the government plan! That way it’ll take 40 years to force all Americans into suckling the government teat and driving the nation’s entire health insurance business into oblivion. What a nice item to add to the national healthcare cart, right? Yeah… right.

See what a nice, moderate radical our gal Hill is?

Moderate like Mussolini standing next to Hitler.

read comments (0)

The newest attempt by Hollywood to puff up the country for a Hillary Clinton presidency - after last year’s bungled attempt, ABC’s Commander In Chief, bombed due to network interference - is to make the next president in Keifer Sutherland’s terrorist playground, Fox’s 24, a woman.

Sure, it’s a bit of old news by now, but apparently the Holly-Libs have themselves worked up in such a lather over a possible President Rodham that she’s opened up a 30-point lead in a recent Sacramento Bee poll that, well, probably only surveyed women. Liberal women. Liberal women who voted for the first president Clinton. And who hate the thought of a black guy named Obama winning anything.

God, I’m not even sure in THAT narrow a demo anyone could find a 30-percent lead for Senator Rodham. Except maybe on the campus of Berkeley. Seriously, among sane people, Def Leppard concert tickets are a hotter item than the thought of a President Rodham.

read comments (0)

I love Steven Spielberg’s movies. He’s one of the best storytellers in Hollywood. But when it comes to his voting booth habits, I’d rather not hear about it. And the latest effort by his DreamWorks’ crew is an example of why.

I’m no fan of Senator Rodham, but it’s hard to imagine she’s not going to end up at the top of the Democratic ticket. So why are Spielberg and company lining up their money behind respectable-but-inexperienced Sen. Barack Obama?

Obama may be the future of the Democratic party, but it’s pretty clear he’s not its present after only two years in federal office. He may want to keep track of the return address labels on all those donations coming in, because unless Sen. Rodham decides to make Obama her running mate, he’s not headed to 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue in ‘08.

Then again, you never know. If enough of Hollywierd lines up behind Obama, there’s always a chance… about the same chance that he’d invite Minnesota Congressman Keith Ellison to be his running mate!

read comments (2)